Animal “rights” groups PETA, HSUS own stock in fast food industry

And then the fast food industry in turn funds PETA’s fake opposition, the Center for Consumer Freedom. In other words, PETA and HSUS are as much tied to the fast food industry as CCF.

———————————–

Sonic to phase-in cage-free eggs
January 20, 2010

The Humane Society of the United States has praised Sonic’s new policy for its improvements in animal welfare in its supply chain. Last week, the HSUS announced that it waspurchasing stock in QSR Jack in the Box and casual-dining hybrid Steak ‘N Shake in order to influence their animal welfare policies.

Nation’s Restaurant News reported that Sonic has been working primarily with PETA for the past 18 to 24 months to develop the new policy. According to the story, HSUS owns stock in Sonic as well as McDonald’s Corp., Tim Hortons Inc. and Wendy’s/Arby’s Group Inc.

FULL ARTICLE
——————————-

PeTA owns stock in Tyson Foods, Hormel and Denny’s
PETA’s beef turns into stock
Activist group is buying shares of Tyson Foods, Hormel and Denny’s in bid to reach shareholders.

By Parija Bhatnagar, CNN/Money Staff Writer
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) -
Animal rights group PETA — People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — said it is upping the ante against food companies and restaurant chains by buying their shares and taking its animal anti-cruelty campaign directly to the shareholders.

Calling it a “reinvigorated strategy,” the agency said for the first time it is vigorously purchasing stock in the leading meat suppliers such as Hormel Foods, Tyson Foods, Pilgrim’s Pride and dining chains Denny’s Restaurants, Outback Steakhouse, Chili’s parent Brinker International and Applebee’s.

“We’re taking on Wall Street,” PETA spokesman Bruce Friedrich told CNN/Money. “We’re buying 50 percent over the minimum number of shares required to submit a shareholder resolution.”

http://www.infocafe.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=192

Interesting strategy PeTA so let me see how this works; you accept donations to save the animals & protect their rights, then you purchase stock in companies that serve and eat them.

This is done so you then can form a shareholder resolution to attempt change while you collect the quarterly benefits of your stock vested in restaurants that serve meat. That would be a brilliant move if you were able to by 51% of the stock in the company,  but a fairly useless and wasted purchase for animal rights to purchase a number to simply submit a shareholder resolution.

PeTA started buying shares in the meat and restaurant industry in 2003, this is what they owned at that date.

Over the last month, PETA said it has acquired 150 shares of Austin, Minn.-based Hormel Foods, the leading processor of turkey and pork; 240 shares of Springdale, Ark.-based No. 1 chicken producer Tyson Foods and 260 shares of Texas-based No. 2 poultry producer Pilgrim’s Pride.

PETA now also owns 11,000 shares of casual dining chain Denny’s and 110 shares of Chili’s parent Brinker International, and will acquire stock in Outback Steakhouse and Applebee’s.

Brilliant move PeTA keep vesting in the restaurant business, you will need the cash to pay the fine for the killings in Ahoskie.  Some things you discover about PeTA are unreal and this is reported by CNN not CFF.

Peace Bill

Michelle Obama profited from the same food industry she claims to be against

More proof that the “anti-obesity” movement is a fake movement funded by the food industry. And notice the connection to Kellogg. Read my blog to find the truth about CSPI’s “attack” on Kellogg – a corporate funder of NANA steering committee member American Dietetic Association.

Big Momma Michelle Obama: Food profiteer-turned-food cop
Michelle Malkin
May 12, 2010

Let me summarize first lady Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity agenda: Shed as I say, not as I gain. While she crusades for organic foods and puts government pressure on corporations to stop marketing fast food and junk food to children, Mrs. Obama herself profited from the very same processed food industry she now demonizes.

In June 2005, a few months after her husband was elected to the U.S. Senate, Mrs. Obama hustled a seat on the corporate Board of Directors of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Despite zero experience, the food-processing company put her on its audit and nominating and corporate governance committees. For her on-the-job training and the privilege of putting her name and face on their literature, the company forked over $45,000 in 2005 and $51,200 in 2006 to Mrs. Obama — as well as 7,500 TreeHouse stock options worth more than $72,000 for each year.

The chairman of the TreeHouse Foods board, Sam K. Reed, was a top executive at Kellogg’s and Keebler Foods, home of that great menace to children, the Keebler Elf. Before that, he headed up Mother’s Cake and Cookie Company. The conglomerate sells cheese sauces, Cremora non-dairy creamer, instant soup, puddings and powdered soft drink mixes. Hardly the stuff of Mrs. Obama’s new vision of nutritional paradise. TreeHouse is also a leading supplier of pickles used in the burgers of evil fast food chain McDonald’s — exactly the kind of corporate restaurants Mrs. Obama is now targeting in her war on urban “food deserts.”

The corporation-bashing Mrs. Obama would have continued raking in her TreeHouse cash if it hadn’t been for her husband’s pesky pledge to pander to Big Labor and swear off Wal-Mart. The retail giant, you see, happened to be TreeHouse’s biggest customer. And Wal-Mart is to Big Labor as sunshine is to Dracula.

FULL ARTICLE

Soda industry front group attempting to have this blog discredited as “industry propaganda”

Just checked my blog tracker software and found that the National Soft Drink Association – a soft drink industry front group funded by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo – were reading my post about how the Rockefeller banksters were forcing their puppet Michael Jacobson of CSPI to push their “soda tax” propaganda. I think they are planning on using my research which I have posted on this blog and posting said research – with their own spin, of course – on their website, or in news print, or as talking points on news shows in an attempt to discredit this blog as “industry propaganda”.

Think this blog will never be linked to in mainstream media articles? Think again.

Let me make this crystal clear. I do not work for the soda industry or the food industry. I do not receive any money from the soda industry or the food industry. I will never accept money from the soda industry or the food industry.

I see your dirty tactics. You’re in bed with the fake “food police”, and you want the sheeple to believe that you and the fake “food police” are at odds with one another. YOU ARE NOT AT ODDS WITH ONE ANOTHER! YOU ARE ALIGNED WITH EACH OTHER! Your tactics will not work!

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer	No referring link
Host Name
IP Address	65.213.226.5
Country	United States
Region	District Of Columbia
City	Washington
ISP	Nat. Soft Drink Assoc.
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	1 min 35 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	IE 8.0
Operating System	WinVista
Resolution	Unknown
Javascript	Disabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	Type	WebPage
7th December 2010	11:15:46	Page View	No referring link freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/rockefeller-banksters-order-michael-f-jacobson-to-push-soda-tax-propaganda/
7th December 2010	11:17:21	Page View	No referring link freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/rockefeller-banksters-order-michael-f-jacobson-to-push-soda-tax-propaganda/

Oh and now Coca-Cola is spying on this blog. According to my blog tracking software, Coca-Cola was reading this post. This is why I am editing this post. The deception is over, Coca-Cola and CSPI.

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer	No referring link
Host Name
IP Address	161.162.4.23
Country	United States
Region	Georgia
City	Atlanta
ISP	The Coca-cola Company
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	0 seconds
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	IE 8.0
Operating System	WinXP
Resolution	Unknown
Javascript	Disabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	Type	WebPage
8th December 2010	10:15:19	Page View	No referring link freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/12/07/soda-industry-front-group-attempting-to-have-this-blog-discredited-as-industry-propaganda/

FBI now watching this blog – government planning on false-flag attack on nanny state shills?

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer	No referring link
Host Name
IP Address	153.31.113.20
Country	United States
Region	West Virginia
City	Bridgeport
ISP	Fbi Criminal Justice Information Systems
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	0 seconds
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	IE 7.0
Operating System	WinXP
Resolution	Unknown
Javascript	Disabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	Type	WebPage
3rd December 2010	09:41:13	Page View	No referring link freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/

I guess the feds really do believe that obesity truth, exposing CSPI’s ties to the food industry and Monsanto, how PETA’s “naked body scanner” propaganda, saying “PETA equates fur/leather wearers and meat eaters with al-Qaeda”, and exposing how PETA and PCRM shill for a beef/dairy industry front is extremist activity.

I’m going to make a prediction: Remember when I said that the Nanny State Liberation Front may be a COINTELPRO operation to be used to associate true “anti-nanny staters” with domestic terrorism? I think the government is planning on using the public’s anger over the steamrolling of S.510 by staging some kind of false-flag attack on a “food cop” such as Michael Jacobson or MeMe Roth or Marion Nestle and claim that the Nanny State Liberation Front was behind it and use that as a pretext to go after anybody who speaks out against CSPI, PETA, and the nanny state in general.

CSPI’s Michael Jacobson smears “obesity truthers” and anti-Monsanto activists as dangerous extremists

http://www.huffingtonpost.com//michael-f-jacobson/a-date-certain-for-food-s_b_786510.html

And the asshole even has the gall to DEFEND Monsanto and smear any Monsanto ties to the food “safety” bill as “conspiracy theory”. In addition, Jacobson uses the term “radical blogs” to smear purveyors of such. In other words, Michael F. Jacobson is now openly calling anti-Monsanto activists and “obesity truthers” as dangerous extremists. I posted a comment on the article where I questioned the integrity of both Jacobson and CSPI for their ties to Monsanto and how CSPI’s NANA coalition is controlled by Monsanto front groups. In addition, I exposed in the comment that Monsanto created the obesity/diabetes epidemics with corn subsidies, HFCS, aspartame, MSG, and GMOs. The last time I commented on one of Jacobson’s propaganda pieces, the comment was approved. This time, I was not so lucky for my comment was not approved. “Obesity truth” is a topic which must be censored by the true perpetrators of the obesity epidemic. They cannot allow the sheeple to know that they helped create the crisis so they can present the “solution” which does not solve the crisis; if anything, the “solution” makes the crisis worse.

Notice how Goebbelson plays the “conspiracy theory” card to dismiss anybody who says Monsanto wrote the bill as “conspiracy theorists”. And also notice how he mentions the internet. Remember, Cass Sunstein wants to censor the internet by banning “conspiracy theorizing”. This is a perfect example of how government shills and intellectual cowards use the term “conspiracy theory” to diffuse criticism of powerful organizations (such as the CFR, Bilderberg, and Monsanto). Here is the spokes-scum smearing anti-Monsanto activists – and probably “obesity truthers”, as evident by my blog tracking software which has caught the Department of Homeland Security spying on some “obesity truth” articles – as “conspiracy theorists” and extremists

Surely it is time to look beyond the more radical blogging about dire consequences of various food safety bills, and recognize how the Senate’s S. 510 has addressed legitimate concerns that federal regulations may overburden small, local producers and processors. Importantly, this bill is NOT about protecting or promoting businesses large or small. It is about protecting us consumers from preventable illnesses caused by unsafe practices by producers. (BULLSHIT! The fucking bill was written by the fucking food industry, Goebbelson! YOUR Monsanto overlords created the crisis! THIS IS YOUR REICHSTAG FIRE! REICHSTAG, GOEBBELSON! REICHSTAG! REICHSTAG!)

The bill would place responsibility for producing safe food directly on the businesses that make and sell food, and it would allow them to design the plans for achieving that purpose. Even so, the scope of the regulations is limited in the latest version of this bill to specifically ensure that small, local food production is able to thrive — while still making safety a priority. It does this by exempting a processor or farm that is a very small business or has less than $500,000 in sales made primarily made directly to consumers or through local retailers. That does not mean they get a pass on food safety. Current federal food safety laws and State laws will continue to apply to these small businesses. It is time to put aside conspiracy theories that have bubbled around the Internet and often have no connection to provisions of S. 510. (Notice how Goebbelson plays the “conspiracy theory” card to dismiss anybody who says Monsanto wrote the bill as “conspiracy theorists”. And also notice how he mentions the internet. Remember, Cass Sunstein wants to censor the internet by banning “conspiracy theorizing”.

My comment which was rejected:

Oh so “obesity truth” is now radical blogging? Am I a dangerous extremist for exposing how your NANA coalition has several Monsanto front groups as steering committee members and that the food “safety” czar is a former Monsanto lawyer? Am I a dangerous extremist for exposing the food industry links to CSPI? YOUR Monsanto overlords created the obesity/diabetes epidemics with corn subsidies, HFCS, aspartame, and MSG. I’m an “obesity troofer” and I wear that label proudly. Oh, and having a LAWYER who isn’t even a scientist shilling for GMO foods as Gregory Jaffe does? I’m beginning to think that you have as much credibility as your fellow Monsanto shill Rick Berman……ZERO.

Bilderberg HHS Secretary and Surgeon-General-slash-Burger King shill call for mandatory BMI ratings of all Americans

Obesity Rating for Every American Must Be Included in Stimulus-Mandated Electronic Health Records, Says HHS
Thursday, July 15, 2010
By Matt Cover, Staff Writer

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/69436

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius speaks to reporters at HHS headquarters in Washington on July 1, 2010. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)
(CNSNews.com) – New federal regulations issued this week stipulate that the electronic health records–that all Americans are supposed to have by 2014 under the terms of the stimulus law that President Barack Obama signed last year–must record not only the traditional measures of height and weight, but also the Body Mass Index: a measure of obesity.

The obesity-rating regulation states that every American’s electronic health record must: “Calculate body mass index. Automatically calculate and display body mass index (BMI) based on a patient’s height and weight.”

The law also requires that these electronic health records be available–with appropriate security measures–on a national exchange.

The new regulations are one of the first steps towards the government’s goal of universal adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) by 2014, as outlined in the 2009 economic stimulus law.  Specifically, the regulations issued on Tuesday by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Dr. David Blumenthal, the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, define the “meaningful use” of electronic records. Under the stimulus law, health care providers–including doctors and hospitals–must establish “meaningful use” of EHRs by 2014 in order to qualify for federal subsidies. After that, they will be subjected to penalties in the form of diminished Medicare and Medicaid payments for not establishing “meaningful use” of EHRs.

Section 3001 of the stimulus law says: “The National Coordinator shall, in consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies (including the National Institute of Standards and Technology), update the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan (developed as of June 3, 2008) to include specific objectives, milestones, and metrics with respect to the following: (i) The electronic exchange and use of health information and the enterprise integration of such information.‘‘(ii) The utilization of an electronic health record for each person in the United States by 2014.”

Under this mandate in the stimulus law, Secretary Sebelius issued a regulation–developed by Dr. Blumenthal–that requires that all EHRs keep track of a person’s Body Mass Index (BMI) score. Body Mass Index is a ratio between a person’s weight and height, and is used to determine whether or not someone is overweight or obese. It is the preferred method of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for measuring obesity.

Michelle Obama has made dealing with the problem of childhood obesity the main theme of her term as First Lady.

According to the CDC,  “BMI provides a reliable indicator of body fatness for most people and is used to screen for weight categories that may lead to health problems.”

A person’s BMI score is used as a tool to screen for obesity or excessive body fat that could lead to other health problems. While it does not actually measure body fat directly, according to CDC, the BMI scores generally correlate with a person’s body fat percentage.

The new regulations also stipulate that the new electronic records be capable of sending public health data to state and federal health agencies such as HHS and CDC. The CDC, which calls American society “obesogenic” – meaning that American society itself promotes obesity – collects BMI scores from state health agencies every year to monitor obesity nationwide.

“Electronically record, retrieve, and transmit syndrome based public health surveillance information to public health agencies,” the regulations read.

With the spread of electronic health records, the CDC apparently will be able to collect such data more efficiently and with greater accuracy because the electronic record keeping systems can send the data automatically, eliminating the need for government – both state and federal – to keep, send, and process physical records.

—————————————————————————

The Surgeon-General was in fact a Burger King advisor! The Obama administration and the fake anti-obesity activists are food industry apologists covering up the roles that aspartame and MSG have played in the manufactured obesity epidemic! Regina Benjamin was a Burger King shill, and the anti-obesity activists belong to fake nutritional advocacy coalitions headed up by food industry front and Monsanto fronts! When will the libsheep wake up and realize that people such as MeMe Roth and organization such as CSPI are actually food industry apologists helping to cover up the TRUE causes of obesity?! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/13/health-nominee-an-adviser-to-burger-king/

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2009/08/obamas-surgeon-general-nominee-advises-burger-king.html

http://entertainment.wagerweb.com/politics/regina-benjamin-also-works-for-burger-king-14441.html

http://www.wkrg.com/alabama/article/dr.-regina-benjamin-paid-by-burger-king/259468/Aug-13-2009_5-15-pm/

Related:

Define irony: When an anti-obesity crusader is a member of a nutritional advocacy coalition headed by food industry front groups

Food Nazis Using Obesity Reichstag to Bring on New Holocaust

MeMe Roth, the ultimate apologist for the food industry and whitewasher of the obesity epidemic

Prison Planet Forum infiltrated by shill for cancer, drug, and food industries

View the whole debate here, and check the replies made by Prison Planet Forum member Paul-w who tries his best – and ultimately fails – at dismissing the obesity promotion of aspartame and MSG as “conspiracy theory” while pushing the Center for Consumer Freedom’s co-opted version of “choice” and “personal responsibility. It’s clear that Paul-w is either a shill for the cancer, drug, and food industries or a Cass Sunstein troll hired to attempt to debunk established facts as “conspiracy theory”.

Sugar industry shill equates fake stevia – Stevia in the Raw – with real stevia in taste test which favors sugar

Comment: The establishment is so scared of stevia that they are using their fake-stevia blackops to dupe ignorant sheeple into believing that the fake stevia products – Truvia, PureVia, Sun Crystals, and Stevia in the Raw – are stevia products when it’s known that these products are actually sugar products with just a dash of chemically-extracted Reb-A (a stevia glycoside). It makes me wonder how much money Susan Alexander and the Knoxville News Sentinel received from the sugar industry and the fake-stevia companies to shill for the sugar industry. The sugar industry couldn’t pay for better propaganda.

———————–

It was a sweet assignment: Compare the artificial sweeteners that are hitting grocery store shelves these days faster than you can say America’s obese.It’s hard to keep up with the options:

* Ideal, made with Xylitol, has zero calories and measures cup for cup like sugar.

* Stevia Extract In the Raw comes from the stevia plant, has zero calories and measures cup for cup like sugar.

* Sun Crystals, a blend of sugar and stevia, has 20 calories per teaspoon. Use half the Sun Crystals that you would sugar.

* I decided Splenda, though not a new kid on the block, was worth including just for comparison’s sake. It has zero calories, is made of sucralose and maltodextrin (an ingredient that was also listed for Stevia and Ideal.) It suggests measuring cup for cup.

With the help of food writer Mary Constantine, I located a corn muffin recipe that made only four muffins, and then I made the recipe five times. Once, I made it with sugar (which, for comparison’s sake, has 15 calories per teaspoon). Then I subbed out the sugar for each of the sweeteners listed above.

Janet Seiber, registered dietician at UT Medical Center, didn’t know of any major health concerns with any of the products we tested. Stevia, she says, is not yet FDA approved, but it is widely used as a sweetener in other countries. Xylitol, she said, may have gastrointestinal side effects for some people.

I brought the muffins to the News Sentinel and set five of my co-workers to the tasting task. They didn’t know which sweetener was used in which muffin, and they didn’t sugarcoat their reactions, which are below – and on video at knoxnews.com.

Susan Alexander may be reached at alexanders@knoxnews.com or 865-342-6431. She is the News Sentinel features editor.

Stevia

* Flavor: “Initial flavor good, but detected odd aftertaste.” “OK; a little mealy, dry. Not a good aftertaste.” “Bland, slightly sweet.” “Bland.” “Good.”

* Sweetness (on a scale of 1-10): “6,” “3,” “6 (noted aftertaste),” “7,” “not sweet at all.”

* Texture: Unanimously dry.

* Appearance: Unanimously good.

Sun Crystals

* Flavor: “Good, would serve to guests.” “Basic.” “Far better than muffin 1 (muffin 1 used Stevia), little aftertaste.” “Mild.” “Corny.”

* Sweetness (on a scale of 1-10): “8,” “3,” “5,” “2,” “7.”

* Texture: unanimously dry (one taster said, “Can’t swallow!).

* Appearance: “Uneven,” one said. “Good,” said the rest.

Splenda

* Flavor: “Corn flavor.” “Bleh.” “Unnaturally sweet.” “Corny!” “Initial taste is too sweet; chemical-like flavor; aftertaste is not very sweet.”

* Sweetness (on a scale of 1-10): “5,” “6,” “8,” “2,” “5.”

* Texture: Three tasters said dry; two said cake-y.

* Appearance: “Good” from four. “Uneven, not golden,” said one.

Ideal

* Flavor: “Tasty.” “Not sweet enough; no aftertaste, but missing something.” “My second favorite; no aftertaste; pretty good.” “Muffin-y; second best.” “More corn than sweet.”

* Sweetness (on a scale of 1-10): “3,” “1 or 2,” “8,” “3,” “4.”

* Texture: “Dense, cake-y.” “Great.” “Dry.” “Good, not too dry.” “Moist, cake-y.”

* Appearance: “Uneven color, uneven top.” “Good.” “Golden.”

Sugar

* Flavor: “Good, no aftertaste.” “Sweet, like candy.” “Yum, rich!” “Good; perfect sweetness.” “Good.”

* Sweetness (on a scale of 1-10): “7,” “5,” “8,” “8,” “8.”

* Texture: One said, “Just right.” Four said, “Moist.”

* Appearance: “Good.” “More uniform in color.” “Golden.”

© 2010, Knoxville News Sentinel Co.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!

Yours truly smeared as CCF shill for blowing the “PETA vs. CCF” false paradigm wide open

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=Gpulw4u2Fjg

darthchaosofrspw2009

5 months ago

@JUMPTHEGUNZZX Yeah well PETA and CCF are both funded by the Rockefellers. You won’t hear CCF attack PETA in their glorified editorials for their Rockefeller connections (other than the revelation of listing the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors as one of PETA’s funders on ActivistCash). You won’t hear PETA attack CCF for being a glorified Monsanto PR firm. (Monsanto is pretty much a Rockefeller Foundation front.) I view the PETA/CCF fake feud the same as “John Cena vs Batista”. Imaginary feuds

@StoogeWatcher The ALF and ELF are CIA fronts. PETA is a front for globalist nonprofits – such as the Tides Foundation and the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors – which are owned by the globalist banksters who seeks to rape the world of wealth.

CDLver says:

And you, darthchaosofrspw2009, are a whore for the pimps at the CCF.

To which I reply:

@CDLver Wow. I attacked CCF for being a Monsanto front, and you have the gall to basically smear me as a CCF shill. I guess it’s now a crime to know the truth of how elites control both sides of phony debates. I’m sorry, but I will never choose sides when both sides are frauds. So eat your GMO soy and GMO corn, get cancer, and die. Scum like you are the ones who deserve sterilization, disease, and death. There is a global depopulation plan, and I’m glad you’re one of their billions of targets.

To which the PETAhead replies:

PETA and the ALF are not party to any globalist bankers’ plot to rape the world of its wealth and depopulate its people, you knuclehead. Only a CCF double-talker pushing the animal killers’ agenda would assert such ridiculousness.

To which I reply (and are summarily buried as spam):

@CDLver Show me proof that I’m a CCF shill. Here’s my website to prove that I’m not, you piece of shit. Would a CCF shill make Zionist lobbyist Richard Berman humble the Iron Sheik way? Would a CCF shill say “Richard Berman and David Martosko want you to eat aspartame, get cancer, and die”? Richard Berman and David Martosko are Washington corporate lobbyists who can suck my dick and choke on it. You don’t like it that I’m blowing the false paradigm wide open.

freedomandlinux(.)wordpress(.)com

@CDLver And by the way, if you were some right-wing douchebag who bought into CCF’s propaganda, you would probably dismiss me as a “PETA double-talker”. I know precisely how you corporate-brainwashed fluorideheads operate.

By the way, here’s another website which show that I don’t shill for anybody from Richard Berman to Michael “I Was For Trans Fats Before I Was Against It” Jacobson.

shillwatch(.)wordpress(.)com

There you have it. If you attack the Center for Consumer Freedom and PETA and link them to the Rockefeller bankster shadow government, you are smeared by PETAheads as a shill for the CCF. And if you attempt to prove that you are not a shill, your subsequent comments are buried under the false guise of spam. REAL mature way of a comeback, CDLver. You and TroyFromWestVirginia would make a lovely couple.

They’re already associating Truvia and PureVia (fake stevia) with real stevia

Wow. The sugar industry shills are in full-force. Check this out.

http://www.viewpoints.com/PureVia-All-Natural-Zero-Calorie-Sweetener-review-bca510

Notice how they say it’s stevia – not PureVia – which “causes birth defects” without showing any proof whatsoever.

And notice how this article puts a photo of SweetLeaf stevia next to photos of Truvia and PureVia.

http://www.sparkpeople.com/resource/nutrition_articles.asp?id=1273&page=3

There it is. They are ALREADY associating Truvia and PureVia – man-made toxins – with stevia itself. It won’t be long before the government admits that Truvia and PureVia are toxic and get the sheeple to beg for stevia itself to be banned altogether. Better buy some stevia plants/seeds at the farmer’s market while you still can because it won’t be long before they start arresting people for selling stevia plants and seed and for having stevia plants growing in their backyards.