Skip navigation

Tag Archives: gmo

Organic Valley will match you dollar-for-dollar to a maximum of $25,000 if you’ll help the Center for Food Safety fight GM Alfalfa.

Please join Organic Valley in supporting the Center for Food Safety’s fight against Monsanto’s Roundup Ready GM Alfalfa!

The Center for Food Safety (CFS) has a long history fighting to stop the proliferation of genetically modified crops. In 2010 they battled Monsanto and the USDA at the U.S. Supreme Court, and were victorious in maintaining the four year ban on the planting and sale of GM alfalfa. CFS also fought successfully to uphold a ban on GM sugar beets; in November, a federal judge ordered the removal and destruction of illegally planted GM beets.

http://www.razoo.com/story/Help-Stop-Gm-Alfalfa

—————————————————————————–

Now that sounds all fine and dandy, but it turns out that Organic Valley and the Center for Food Safety are not what they seem to be.

Let’s think back to just a few short months ago when word broke out that the “organic elite” – consisting of Organic Valley, Whole Foods Market, and Stonyfield Farms – pretty much sold out to the Monsanto agenda

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22449.cfm

“The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must.”   -  Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011

In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation’s 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America’s organic consumers and producers are facing betrayalA self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.

And while the Center for Food Safety presents itself as anti-GMO, it turns out that they are actually funded by the spearheaders of the GMO movement – the Rockefellers.

http://www.infowars.com/food-depopulation-scams-and-solutions/

Some “non-profit” tax exempt 501(c)3 organizations have been known to engage in controlled opposition. For example, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) represented farmers in opposition to Monsanto in the Supreme Court GMO alfalfa case and in many other anti-GMO cases. While we have no way of knowing whether Andrew Kimbrell, the Executive Director of CFS and his brother George (of counsel) performed solid work in opposing Monsanto or whether they sandbagged the endeavor, there are reports that CFS and its parent company have taken in $1.75 million dollars from the John Merck Fund, which has ties to the Rockefeller Family Fund. Andrew Kimbrell of CFS filed a petition with the EPA to ban colloidal silver which is a natural antibiotic agent with many benefits that competes directly with Merck’s dubious pharmaceutical drugs. This organization has the appearance of working in the public’s interest, but in a separate action, it has operated in opposition to public benefit.

http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/C_Anderson3-8-11.html

According to tax forms provided by Guidestar.org, the Center for Food Safety, a NPO whose lawyers have represented farmers against Monsanto, is a recipient of a grant from the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors foundation for $75,000 in 2008 and the Center for Food Safety’s sister agency, the International Center for Technology Assessment, received $147,000 from the Rockefeller Family Fund in 2008.  This would appear to be a deep conflict of interest because the Rockefellers have been primary funders for advancing the genetically modified food revolution and agricultural manipulation as chronicled in F. William Engdahl’s book ‘Seeds of Desrtuction’.

Perhaps a more fitting name for the CFS (Center for Food Safety) would be Criminals for Frankenfood Supremacy.

Chicago school bans some lunches brought from home
To encourage healthful eating, Chicago school doesn’t allow kids to bring lunches or certain snacks from home — and some parents, and many students, aren’t fans of the policy

Fernando Dominguez cut the figure of a young revolutionary leader during a recent lunch period at his elementary school.

“Who thinks the lunch is not good enough?” the seventh-grader shouted to his lunch mates in Spanish and English.

Dozens of hands flew in the air and fellow students shouted along: “We should bring our own lunch! We should bring our own lunch! We should bring our own lunch!”

Fernando waved his hand over the crowd and asked a visiting reporter: “Do you see the situation?”

At his public school, Little Village Academy on Chicago’s West Side, students are not allowed to pack lunches from home. Unless they have a medical excuse, they must eat the food served in the cafeteria.

REST: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/education/ct-met-school-lunch-restrictions-041120110410,0,4567867.story

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22449.cfm

The Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto: What Now?

* By Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association, Jan 27, 2011

“The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must.”   –  Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011

In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation’s 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America’s organic consumers and producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.

In a cleverly worded, but profoundly misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and “seed purity,” gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to approve the “conditional deregulation” of Monsanto’s genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa.  Beyond the regulatory euphemism of “conditional deregulation,” this means that WFM and their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop, alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as 2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the U.S.

Full article–
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22449.cfm

Please sign petition here:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm

Terrorists may poison the food supply (but the food companies already have)

Mike Adams
NaturalNews
December 23, 2010

Always on the terror streak, the mainstream media is now warning Americans that terrorists may strike the food supply by dumping poison into restaurant salad bars and buffets, for example. CBS News broke the story, quoting anonymous “intelligence” sources who insist that terrorists might use ricin or cyanide to poison foods in salad bars.

I have news for CBS, the federal government, and the terrorists: If you really want to poison the U.S. food supply, just use aspartame. It causes neurological disorders and yet remains perfectly legal to dump into foods such as diet sodas and children’s medicines. You don’t even have to dump it into the food supply in secret, either: You can do it right out in full view of the public. Heck, you can even list this chemical right on the ingredients label!

Or get into the MSG business. MSG, which is often hidden on “natural” foods under an ingredient called yeast extract, is a potent neurotoxin that promotes obesity and even cancer, according to some experts. Feed people enough MSG and they’ll probably die of cancer sooner or later, and that counts toward the goal of terrorism too, doesn’t it?

If you really want to get nasty and up the body count, start a hot dog company and dump sodium nitrite into your processed meat like all the other hot dog companies do. Sodium nitrite promotes aggressive cancers — even in children — and yet the USDA and FDA allow its use in the food supply (http://www.naturalnews.com/007133.html).

Better yet, feed the population genetically modified corn and then wait for the mutations to kick in. GMOs might actually be called a biological weapon because they cause so much harm to humans and the environment. (http://www.naturalnews.com/GMO.html)

Why be a terrorist when you can do so much more damage as a processed food company?

If you’re a terrorist looking to poison the U.S. food supplyget in line, buddy! The food companies have beat you to it!

In the U.S. food supply right now, you can find toxic mercury, BPA, acrylamides, petrochemicals, dangerous preservatives, synthetic chemicals like aspartame, pesticide residues and artificial colors that alter brain function. The FDA doesn’t seem to care about any of this, of course: All these poisons in the food supply are legal!

So here’s a message to Al-Qaeda and all the other terrorists trying to kill Americans: Don’t bother with bombs and missiles… just get into the processed food business!

Or, heck, if you really want to kill Americans with poisonget into the cancer industry! The “Al-Qaeda Cancer Clinic” could really rack up some body bags by doing what all the other cancer clinics do: Inject patients with chemotherapy and watch them die (http://www.naturalnews.com/029996_c…).

Seriously, if you want to kill Americans, all you really need to do is keep supporting conventional medicine and the FDA with its do-nothing position on dangerous chemicals that threaten the health of Americans right now. FDA-approved drugs kill well over 100,000 Americans each year — a statistic that dwarfs the body count of any terrorist group.

Come to think of it, how do we know the FDA isn’t already being run by terrorists? Their actions, which blatantly endanger American lives, are entirely consistent with the aims of a terrorist organization. (http://www.naturalnews.com/001894.html)

By the way, this is all depicted in a CounterThink cartoon I created in 2006 called The Food Terroristshttp://www.counterthink.com/The_Foo… (see cartoon above).

This cartoon anticipated today’s terror news alerts by four years. That’s because when it comes to the U.S. government’s rhetoric on terrorism, it’s not that difficult to see where they’re taking it.

Want to know what the next four years will bring us? I’ll soon be publishing a list of predictions for 2011 and beyond. Watch NaturalNews.com for that announcement.

Sources for this story include:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010…

 

 

 

Wikileaks cable reveals U.S. conspired to retaliate against European nations if they resisted GMOs

Mike Adams
December 24, 2010

Wikileaks continues to rock the political world by shedding light on conspiracies, corruption and cover-ups. The latest batch of diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks reveals what can only be characterized as a U.S.-led conspiracy to force GMOs onto European countries by making those countries pay a steep price if they resist.

The cable reveals the words ofCraig Stapleton, the US ambassador to France, who was pushing the commercial interests of the biotech industry by attempting to force GMOs into France. In his own words (below), he expresses his frustration with the idea that France might pass environmental laws that would hamper the expansion of GMOs:

“Europe is moving backwards not forwards on this issue with France playing a leading role, along with Austria, Italy and even the [European] Commission… Moving to retaliation will make clear that the current path has real costs to EU interests and could help strengthen European pro-biotech voice.”

Got that so far? His own words: “Retaliation” as a way to “make [it] clear” that resisting GMOs will have a price.

Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030828_GMOs_Wikileaks.html#ixzz195t4Ps7h

Myths and Misinformation About Fat and Cholesterol: How Bad Science and Big Business Have Created the Obesity Epidemic
April 16, 2011 @ 6:30 p.m.

University Club, Harbour Room
One Tampa Center, 201 N. Franklin St., 38th Floor. A R.S.V.P. . is required

PLEASE do your duty as a citizen journalist and get an RSVP and attend the conference, take a video camera, and ask questions if allowed to do so. If you ask any questions, please ask about Monsanto controlling the so-called “food police” and their fake opposition posing as “personal responsibility advocates”. And do some research on my blog and use the information I have gathered on my blog to come up with your questions and/or talking points. This is our ULTIMATE CHANCE to finally show the sheeple that the “food police” are in bed with the food industry!

In addition, I would recommend buying Tom Naughton’s Fathead documentary on DVD and using information gathered from there in your questions and/or talking points.

Some articles you may with to use to come up with your talking points and/or questions:

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/define-irony-member-of-cspis-nana-nutritional-advocacy-coalition-also-fronts-for-coca-cola/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/07/11/define-irony-when-an-anti-obesity-crusader-is-a-member-of-a-nutritional-advocacy-coalition-headed-by-food-industry-front-groups/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/define-irony-member-of-cspis-nana-coalition-is-a-mcdonalds-front-group/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/cspis-resident-gmo-shill-gregory-jaffe-is-a-lawyer-not-a-scientist/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/food-nazis-using-obesity-reichstag-to-bring-on-new-holocaust/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/meme-roth-the-ultimate-apologist-for-the-food-industry-and-whitewasher-of-the-obesity-epidemic/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/cspi-says-splenda-toxicity-is-a-conspiracy-theory/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/05/19/from-2003-and-2004-cspi-calls-for-a-food-pearl-harbor-as-pretext-to-pass-food-safety-reform/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/food-industry-apologist-michael-jacobson-appears-on-the-oreilly-factor/

http://food.change.org/petitions/view/tell_cspi_remove_the_american_dietetic_association_from_nana_nutritional_advocacy_coalition

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/07/04/food-industry-apologist-marion-nestle-says-butylhydroquinone-and-dimethylpolysiloxane-found-in-chicken-mcnuggets-pose-no-health-risks/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/%E2%80%9Cfood-cops%E2%80%9D-and-%E2%80%9Cnutritional-%E2%80%98advocates%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D-marion-nestle-and-cspi-team-with-food-industry-shills-to-defend-hfcs/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/why-do-the-food-police-and-hfcs-shills-both-say-hfcs-is-the-same-as-sugar/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/cspi-food-nazis-take-a-cue-from-pnac-and-911-use-salmonella-false-flag-to-justify-the-food-patriot-act/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/salmonella-eggs-there-was-prior-knowledge-it-was-allowed-to-happen-on-purpose/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/controlled-opposition-phony-animal-rights-groups-pcrm-peta-still-shilling-for-beefdairy-industry-front-american-dietetic-association/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/mainstream-media-article-exposes-how-the-food-police-are-funded-by-the-food-industry-yet-covers-up-how-aspartame-and-msg-cause-obesity/

http://freedomandlinux.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/the-fake-war-on-obesity-mcdonalds-kfc-pepsi-to-dictate-obesity-policy/

And don’t forget Codex Alimentarius!

April 16, 2011 | 6:30 p.m. | David Diamond, USF professor of psychology, molecular pharmacology and physiology

Despite the well-established health benefits of diets rich in cholesterol and saturated fats, poorly conducted research has led the general public to believe the myth that a low-fat, low-cholesterol, meat-restricted diet promotes good health. David Diamond will review the history of how poorly conducted research, inappropriate government intervention and large profits to drug companies have contributed to the obesity epidemic and overall decline in the health of Americans.


http://www.grist.org/article/2010-09-20-why-is-the-fda-about-to-rubber-stamp-ge-salmon

Gregory Jaffe: Last and perhaps most concerning, the committee’s supposed consumer advocate is a lawyer (not a scientist) representing the Center for Science in the Public Interest, an organization that favors the use of agricultural biotechnology. Like Van Eeenennaam, he has served on AC21, from 2004 to 2008. His views can be seen in a paper he wrote called “Creating the Proper Environment for Acceptance of Agricultural Biotechnology.” In it he states CSPI’s unequivocal support for agricultural biology and his belief that genetically engineered crops have increased productivity and farmer income while reducing pesticide use, and that GE crops are safe for humans and the environment. Each of these conclusions is controversial, and credible evidence abounds disproving each, give or take the claim on farmer income.

Jaffe completes the paper by tackling what he sees as the true threat of biotechnology — public acceptance of GE foods. He calls for “a strong, but not stifling, regulatory system.” He also calls for the regulatory system to be “transparent and participatory” with “independent risk assessment research that informs the public and regulators.” Sounds good, but a full reading of the paper makes it apparent that perhaps his interest in regulation is intended more as a public show to convince the public to eat GE foods, than a true review of the safety of GE products. In a more recent article, “Questions About Genetically Engineered Animals,” Jaffe expresses optimism that genetically engineered animals, including the AquAdvantage salmon, will provide environmental or health benefits.

http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12529-gm-salmon-are-you-out-of-your-minds

Gregory Jaffe was also imported into the committee as their supposed consumer advocate. In reality, he is with the pro-GMO Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), an organization that consistently ignores the mounting evidence of adverse health impacts from GE crops. Jaffe even filed a complaint to the FDA in 2001 complaining of companies that label their products as non-GMO. What further qualified Jaffe for his committee position was his published article Questions About Genetically Engineered Animals, where he touts the environmental benefits of AquAdvantage salmon.

—————————————

http://www.connectlive.com/events/pewagbiotech062702/jaffebio-html.html

BIOGRAPHY:
GREGORY JAFFE, J.D.
DIRECTOR, PROJECT ON BIOTECHNOLOGY
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Gregory Jaffe is the Director of the Project on Biotechnology for the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”), an advocacy and educational organization that focuses on nutrition and health, food safety, alcohol policy, and sound science. CSPI was instrumental in pushing through the federal law to create the “Nutrition Facts” label with clear nutrition information and that set standards for nutrition and health claims on food labels.  CSPI is supported primarily by its 800,000 subscribers to its Nutrition Action Healthletter, a health and nutrition magazine published ten times a year.

Mr. Jaffe came to CSPI after a long and distinguished career in government service.  He first worked as a Trial Attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environmental and Natural Resources Division for seven years.  He then moved on to become Senior Counsel with the U.S. EPA, Air Enforcement Division, before joining CSPI to direct the Biotechnology project.  Over the last decade, he has been a strong advocate for federal positions in federal court and frequently has spoken publicly on behalf of EPA.  At EPA he was awarded a bronze medal for commendable service, a special achievement award, and a gold medal for performance.

Jaffe’s interest in biotechnology began early in his career when he wrote a law review article on regulatory issues surrounding biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. In the early 1990s, while at the Department of Justice, he advised the Assistant Attorney General on biotechnology issues and worked with a federal interagency committee addressing biotechnology policy.  He is currently a member of the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology’s Stakeholders Forum and was a member of the University of Pennsylvania Bioethics Center’s GMO Consumer Values Panel.  He has published articles on agricultural biotechnology in the Christian Science Monitor, the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Update magazine, and the Environmental Law Institute’s Environmental Forum Magazine.  He also has spoken at over a dozen conferences addressing agricultural biotechnology issues, both in the United States and abroad.  He is a recognized expert on the U.S. regulatory structure for agricultural biotechnology as well as consumer issues pertaining to agricultural biotechnology.

Gregory Jaffe earned his BA with High Honors from Wesleyan University in Biology and then received a degree from Harvard Law School.

Health Food “Obsession” Seen as Mental Illness

Amelia Hill
The Guardian
August 16, 2009
Eating disorder charities are reporting a rise in the number of people suffering from a serious psychological condition characterised by an obsession with healthy eating.The condition, orthorexia nervosa, affects equal numbers of men and women, but sufferers tend to be aged over 30, middle-class and well-educated.

The condition was named by a Californian doctor, Steven Bratman, in 1997, and is described as a “fixation on righteous eating”. Until a few years ago, there were so few sufferers that doctors usually included them under the catch-all label of “Ednos” – eating disorders not otherwise recognised. Now, experts say, orthorexics take up such a significant proportion of the Ednos group that they should be treated separately.

Read entire article

~~~~~—> http://food.change.org/blog/view/nations_food_policy_pro-pus_pro-e_coli_pro-bribery_pro-gmos

Nation’s Food Policy Pro-Pus, Pro-E. Coli, Pro-Bribery, Pro-GMOs

by Natasha Chart
July 10, 2009

EXCERPT:

Pro-Pus

So Michael Taylor, Monsanto’s former lawyer and a fan of adding extra pus to the nation’s milk supply by way of giving all our dairy cows chronic mastitis from rBST/rBGH, has indeed been hired to the newly created position of Deputy Commissioner of Food with the Food Safety Working Group at the FDA.

In theory, Taylor might not be as bad as all that, he shilled for rBST as a young, impressionable executive and he seems to have grown as a person.

Though adding insult to injury, Pennsylvania’s Dennis Wolff is a finalist for Undersecretary of Food Safety. A willing and enthusiastic participant in Monsanto’s campaign to prevent rBST-free labeling on milk, Wolff tried to sneak a 2008 ban on the labels under the noses of Pennsylvania citizens who were outraged and forced the governor to overturn the policy.

But really, two, TWO people appointed or being considered to head food safety in the Obama administration who opposed the public’s right to know when their milk came from cows being treated with a hormone that gives them chronically inflamed and infected udders!?

(BTW, people would have heard about the bovine growth hormone controversy more widely as of the year 2000, perhaps, if Monsanto hadn’t instigated the firing of two journalists who tried to expose rBST/rBGH for the carcinogenic, bovine mastitis-causing health disaster that it is. Though also, and this is funny, ha-ha, as part of the resolution of the ensuing litigation, a judge ruled that it wasn’t illegal for a news station to lie. F*ers!)

So, I think we can safely say that there are those in our national food safety leadership who don’t consider pus a worrying contaminant in the milk supply. Even if they don’t hire Wolff, that this didn’t immediately disqualify him, that they’d consider adding to the shame of hiring Taylor, is a mark of some serious concern.

Pro-E. coli

As reported, again at ObamaFoodorama, this is another of goals of the Obama administration’s food policy:

*Reducing the Threat of E. coli O157:H7: The bacterial strain called E. coli O157:H7 causes diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fever in approximately 70,000 Americans each year. In an estimated one in 15 patients, complications arise potentially resulting in intense pain, high blood pressure, kidney failure, and even death. In recent years, this bacterium has caused outbreaks associated with meat and spinach. …

It goes on like that, very lofty sounding goals framed in descriptions of problems that those interested in food policy are generally familiar with. Here’s what they propose to address the E. coli problem: more inspections of slaughter facilities. Here’s what would work: stop feeding cows grain and give them hay, or at the very least, feed them hay the few days before slaughter.

Cows’ stomachs are supposed to have a near neutral pH of 6.5-7.2, whereas the healthy human gut has an acidic pH that hovers around 2-3. (More about the pH scale.)

The bacteria found in the guts of health cows eating a normal cow diet of high fiber, low starch grass and hay is generally no match for the acidic environment of a human stomach. Our stomach secretions aren’t only there to digest our food, but to be the first line of our immune defense.

It’s because we have feedlots full of cows suffering permanent acidosis and standing in each other’s poop their whole lives that we continue having outbreaks of a bacterial strain that shouldn’t stand a chance against our stomach acid.

Does the federal government currently have a plan to reduce the concentration of animals into cruel and revolting factory feedlot farms? No. That would injure Cargill’s right to profit,* and it’s just not profitable to And in further fact, they’re going to continue subsidizing their waste management costs through the existing provisions of the Farm Bill.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.